Friday 23 October - Sunday 25 October: Technical issue

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases. We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to make a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website.  

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201403540

  • Case ref:
    201403540
  • Date:
    September 2015
  • Body:
    Forth Valley NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C complained about the care and treatment her late mother (Mrs A) received at Forth Valley Royal Hospital. Mrs A was admitted with kidney failure and, further to treatment, was discharged eight days later. However, she became ill again the following day and required re-admission. She responded well to treatment, this time for heart failure, but subsequently suffered a sudden heart attack and died. Mrs C raised concerns that the board did not take reasonable account of Mrs A's pre-existing heart problems when treating her kidney failure during her first admission. She felt that this led to them overloading her with fluids, thus contributing to her subsequent heart failure and eventual death. She also questioned the appropriateness of the discharge following Mrs A's first admission, raising concerns that her heart failure should have been detected prior to this and noting that Mrs A had been vomiting on the day of discharge.

We took independent advice from one of our medical advisers, with experience in the acute hospital care of elderly patients with multiple illnesses. He explained that the treatment of kidney failure involves fluids being provided, whereas the treatment of heart failure requires fluid restriction. He advised that a careful balancing act was required where a patient has both kidney and heart problems. He considered that the doctors caring for Mrs A were mindful of this and said the treatment provided to her during both admissions was reasonable. He also considered the interim discharge to have been clinically appropriate at the time. He said Mrs A's sudden heart attack could not have been predicted and was not connected to her treatment. We accepted this advice and did not uphold the complaints.

Updated: March 13, 2018